BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
METHOD:PUBLISH
PRODID:-//Telerik Inc.//Sitefinity CMS 15.4//EN
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:UTC
BEGIN:STANDARD
DTSTART;VALUE=DATE:20250101
TZNAME:UTC
TZOFFSETFROM:+0000
TZOFFSETTO:+0000
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DESCRIPTION:Date: Thursday 8th October 2026Time:&nbsp\;16:00 - 17:30 GMTLoc
 ation:&nbsp\;Online via ZoomWho is this event intended for?&nbsp\;Statisti
 cians conducting aggregate safety monitoring of clinical trials.What is th
 e benefit of attending?&nbsp\;Understand the regulatory requirements\, pot
 ential barriers and practical considerations when monitoring safety data i
 n ongoing clinical trials.OverviewThis PSI/EFSPI webinar\, co-organized wi
 th PHUSE and the ASA Biopharm Safety Working Group\, provides an overview 
 of safety reporting requirements and safety surveillance in ongoing clinic
 al trials. The session will explore the regulatory framework underpinning 
 safety monitoring\, including serious adverse event reporting\, assessment
  of emerging safety signals\, governance considerations\, and approaches f
 or maintaining trial integrity.Through presentations from industry experts
 \, attendees will gain insight into both the scientific principles and ope
 rational implementation of aggregate safety monitoring\, including practic
 al challenges\, safety surveillance processes\, and real-world approaches 
 to supporting compliant and effective safety oversight during clinical dev
 elopment. As the first webinar in a planned series on safety in clinical t
 rials\, this session will establish the foundational concepts needed to un
 derstand more advanced topics in subsequent events.RegistrationThis webina
 r is free to attend for PSI Members &amp\; Non-Members.To register for thi
 s event\, please&nbsp\;click here.Speaker detailsSpeaker\n Biography\n Pre
 sentation Abstract\n Rima Izem\, Director in Biostatistics\, Novartis\n Dr
  Rima Izem is Real World Evidence Scientific Lead in the Advanced Quantita
 tive Sciences group at Novartis in Basel\, Switzerland. She has nearly 20 
 years of experience in pharmaceutical research\, including ten years at th
 e US Food and Drug Administration and prior academic appointments. Her wor
 k has supported benefit-risk evaluation and regulatory decision-making acr
 oss multiple therapeutic areas and throughout the product lifecycle\, from
  clinical development to the post-authorization setting. Her recent intere
 sts include the application of causal inference methods and hybrid study d
 esigns that integrate evidence from clinical trials and real-world data so
 urces\, particularly in rare events and rare diseases.\n        This prese
 ntation will provide an introduction of safety evaluation in clinical tria
 ls. This will begin by outlining the key scientific objectives that underp
 in these evaluations\, including the protection of trial participants and 
 the evaluation of a treatment&rsquo\;s benefit-risk profile. Then\, the pr
 esentation will introduce some safety- specific terminology\, concepts\, a
 nd/or principles and illustrate these concepts on a toy example. The prese
 ntation will put recent methodological development\, existing methods and 
 challenges\, in a historical context of evolving legislation\, guidelines\
 , and advances in therapeutic development.Matthias Trampisch\, Expert TAM 
 Statistician\, Boehringer Ingelheim\n Dr. Matthias Trampisch is an Expert 
 TAM Statistician and independent statistician (iSTAT) within the Independe
 nt Statistical Analysis Team (iSAT) at Boehringer Ingelheim\, where he has
  been supporting independent statistical activities for almost 10 years no
 w. He provides statistical support to Data Monitoring Committees (DMCs) an
 d conducts independent unblinded analyses during ongoing clinical trials\,
  including assessments of anticipated serious adverse events (SAEs) and em
 erging safety signals. His work focuses on supporting FDA IND safety repor
 ting requirements while maintaining trial integrity through robust indepen
 dent review processes. He played a key role in establishing Boehringer Ing
 elheim's statistical framework\, standards\, and processes for independent
  analyses and serves as an R Governance Process Owner (R GPO)\, supporting
  the compliant and sustainable use of R across the organization.\n        
 Beyond Individual Cases: Operationalizing FDA IND Safety Reporting for Ant
 icipated Serious Adverse EventsThe FDA requires expedited reporting of sus
 pected unexpected serious adverse reactions (SUSARs) during clinical trial
 s\, including the assessment of anticipated serious adverse events (SAEs).
  Implementing these requirements &ndash\; specifically for the assessment 
 of anticipated events - can be challenging\, particularly when unblinded a
 nalyses are needed to evaluate treatment group imbalances while preserving
  trial integrity. This presentation discusses practical approaches for con
 ducting independent unblinded safety analyses\, comparing external CRO mod
 els with internal Independent Statistical Analysis Teams (iSATs). Key topi
 cs include governance\, Safety Surveillance Plans\, trigger-based and peri
 odic review strategies\, output validation\, and maintaining operational i
 ndependence. The session provides recommendations for selecting and implem
 enting an effective safety surveillance model that supports regulatory com
 pliance\, patient safety\, and scientific rigor.&nbsp\;TBC\n &nbsp\;Demons
 tration using a toy example of how a sponsor project team could plan and i
 mplement a Bayesian Detection of potential Risk using Inference on Blinded
  Safety data (BDRIBS) as an example of a blinded trigger approach.
DTEND:20261008T173000Z
DTSTAMP:20260828T130602Z
DTSTART:20261008T160000Z
LOCATION:
SEQUENCE:0
SUMMARY:Joint PSI/EFSPI\, Phuse\, ASA Safety Working Group Webinar Series: 
 Overview of safety analysis and implementation process of safety surveilla
 nce in ongoing studies
UID:RFCALITEM639235191621999067
X-ALT-DESC;FMTTYPE=text/html:<p><strong>Date: </strong>Thursday 8th October
  2026<br /><strong>Time:</strong>&nbsp\;16:00 - 17:30 GMT<br /><strong>Loc
 ation:</strong>&nbsp\;Online via Zoom<br /><strong></strong><strong></stro
 ng></p><p><strong>Who is this event intended for?</strong>&nbsp\;Statistic
 ians conducting aggregate safety monitoring of clinical trials.</p><p><str
 ong></strong><strong>What is the benefit of attending?</strong>&nbsp\;Unde
 rstand the regulatory requirements\, potential barriers and practical cons
 iderations when monitoring safety data in ongoing clinical trials.</p><h2>
 Overview</h2><p>This PSI/EFSPI webinar\, co-organized with PHUSE and the A
 SA Biopharm Safety Working Group\, provides an overview of safety reportin
 g requirements and safety surveillance in ongoing clinical trials. The ses
 sion will explore the regulatory framework underpinning safety monitoring\
 , including serious adverse event reporting\, assessment of emerging safet
 y signals\, governance considerations\, and approaches for maintaining tri
 al integrity.</p><p>Through presentations from industry experts\, attendee
 s will gain insight into both the scientific principles and operational im
 plementation of aggregate safety monitoring\, including practical challeng
 es\, safety surveillance processes\, and real-world approaches to supporti
 ng compliant and effective safety oversight during clinical development. A
 s the first webinar in a planned series on safety in clinical trials\, thi
 s session will establish the foundational concepts needed to understand mo
 re advanced topics in subsequent events.<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/p
 st.2472" target="_new"></a></p><h2><span style="background-color:transpare
 nt\;color:inherit\;font-family:inherit\;font-size:inherit\;text-align:inhe
 rit\;text-transform:inherit\;word-spacing:normal\;caret-color:auto\;white-
 space:inherit\;">Registration</span></h2><p>This webinar is free to attend
  for PSI Members &amp\; Non-Members.<br />To register for this event\, ple
 ase&nbsp\;<strong><span style="text-decoration:underline\;"><a href="https
 ://psi.glueup.com/event/maths-meets-medicine-exploring-careers-in-the-phar
 maceutical-industry-130333"></a><strong><span style="text-decoration:under
 line\;"><a href="https://psi.glueup.com/event/joint-psi-efspi-phuse-asa-sa
 fety-working-group-webinar-series-overview-of-safety-analysis-and-implemen
 tation-process-of-safety-surveillance-in-ongoing-studies-192896/">click he
 re.</a></span></strong></span></strong></p><h2>Speaker details</h2><table 
 class="table table-striped table-bordered k-table" style="width:100%\;"><t
 body><tr><td style="width:20%\;"><strong>Speaker</strong>\n </td><td style
 ="width:40%\;"><strong>Biography</strong>\n </td><td style="width:40%\;"><
 strong>Presentation Abstract</strong>\n </td></tr><tr><td style="width:20%
 \;vertical-align:top\;"><img src="https://www.psiweb.org/images/default-so
 urce/webinar-26/untitled-design-(6).png?sfvrsn=3867a9db_1&amp\;sf_site_tem
 p=true&amp\;sf_site=aa6f9fcc-8c60-4e6d-90ca-8c73a12c9f03" style="max-width
 :100%\;height:auto\;display:block\;margin-left:auto\;margin-right:auto\;" 
 width="272" height="271" sf-image-responsive="true" alt="" title="Untitled
  design (6)" /><p style="text-align:center\;"><em>Rima Izem\, Director in 
 Biostatistics\, Novartis</em>\n </p></td><td style="width:40%\;vertical-al
 ign:top\;"><p>Dr Rima Izem is Real World Evidence Scientific Lead in the A
 dvanced Quantitative Sciences group at Novartis in Basel\, Switzerland. Sh
 e has nearly 20 years of experience in pharmaceutical research\, including
  ten years at the US Food and Drug Administration and prior academic appoi
 ntments. Her work has supported benefit-risk evaluation and regulatory dec
 ision-making across multiple therapeutic areas and throughout the product 
 lifecycle\, from clinical development to the post-authorization setting. H
 er recent interests include the application of causal inference methods an
 d hybrid study designs that integrate evidence from clinical trials and re
 al-world data sources\, particularly in rare events and rare diseases.\n  
       </p></td><td style="width:40%\;vertical-align:top\;"><p>This present
 ation will provide an introduction of safety evaluation in clinical trials
 . This will begin by outlining the key scientific objectives that underpin
  these evaluations\, including the protection of trial participants and th
 e evaluation of a treatment&rsquo\;s benefit-risk profile. Then\, the pres
 entation will introduce some safety- specific terminology\, concepts\, and
 /or principles and illustrate these concepts on a toy example. The present
 ation will put recent methodological development\, existing methods and ch
 allenges\, in a historical context of evolving legislation\, guidelines\, 
 and advances in therapeutic development.</p></td></tr><tr><td style="width
 :20%\;vertical-align:top\;"><img src="https://www.psiweb.org/images/defaul
 t-source/webinar-26/untitled-design-(7).png?sfvrsn=8264a9db_1&amp\;sf_site
 _temp=true&amp\;sf_site=aa6f9fcc-8c60-4e6d-90ca-8c73a12c9f03" style="max-w
 idth:100%\;height:auto\;display:block\;margin-left:auto\;margin-right:auto
 \;" width="272" height="271" sf-image-responsive="true" alt="" title="Unti
 tled design (7)" /><p itemprop="name" style="text-align:center\;"><em>Matt
 hias Trampisch\, Expert TAM Statistician\, Boehringer Ingelheim</em>\n </p
 ></td><td style="width:40%\;vertical-align:top\;"><p>Dr. Matthias Trampisc
 h is an Expert TAM Statistician and independent statistician (iSTAT) withi
 n the Independent Statistical Analysis Team (iSAT) at Boehringer Ingelheim
 \, where he has been supporting independent statistical activities for alm
 ost 10 years now. He provides statistical support to Data Monitoring Commi
 ttees (DMCs) and conducts independent unblinded analyses during ongoing cl
 inical trials\, including assessments of anticipated serious adverse event
 s (SAEs) and emerging safety signals. His work focuses on supporting FDA I
 ND safety reporting requirements while maintaining trial integrity through
  robust independent review processes. He played a key role in establishing
  Boehringer Ingelheim's statistical framework\, standards\, and processes 
 for independent analyses and serves as an R Governance Process Owner (R GP
 O)\, supporting the compliant and sustainable use of R across the organiza
 tion.\n        </p></td><td style="width:40%\;vertical-align:top\;"><p><st
 rong>Beyond Individual Cases: Operationalizing FDA IND Safety Reporting fo
 r Anticipated Serious Adverse Events</strong></p><p>The FDA requires exped
 ited reporting of suspected unexpected serious adverse reactions (SUSARs) 
 during clinical trials\, including the assessment of anticipated serious a
 dverse events (SAEs). Implementing these requirements &ndash\; specificall
 y for the assessment of anticipated events - can be challenging\, particul
 arly when unblinded analyses are needed to evaluate treatment group imbala
 nces while preserving trial integrity. </p><p>This presentation discusses 
 practical approaches for conducting independent unblinded safety analyses\
 , comparing external CRO models with internal Independent Statistical Anal
 ysis Teams (iSATs). Key topics include governance\, Safety Surveillance Pl
 ans\, trigger-based and periodic review strategies\, output validation\, a
 nd maintaining operational independence. </p>The session provides recommen
 dations for selecting and implementing an effective safety surveillance mo
 del that supports regulatory compliance\, patient safety\, and scientific 
 rigor.<p>&nbsp\;</p></td></tr><tr><td style="width:20%\;vertical-align:top
 \;"><p itemprop="name" style="text-align:center\;"><em>TBC</em>\n </p></td
 ><td style="width:40%\;vertical-align:top\;"><p>&nbsp\;</p></td><td style=
 "width:40%\;vertical-align:top\;"><p>Demonstration using a toy example of 
 how a sponsor project team could plan and implement a Bayesian Detection o
 f potential Risk using Inference on Blinded Safety data (BDRIBS) as an exa
 mple of a blinded trigger approach.</p></td></tr></tbody></table>
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR
